FASGX vs. BACIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX).
FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991. BACIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 15, 2005.
Performance
FASGX vs. BACIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASGX vs. BACIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 36.34% | 11.03% | 4.23% | 2.97% | 43.64% | 43.50% | -29.38% | 13.04% | -19.55% | 2.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly lower than BACIX's 36.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FASGX has underperformed BACIX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while BACIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
BACIX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 10.35%
- YTD
- 36.34%
- 6M
- 39.26%
- 1Y
- 39.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASGX vs. BACIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than BACIX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASGX vs. BACIX — Risk / Return Rank
FASGX
BACIX
FASGX vs. BACIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASGX | BACIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.90 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 2.28 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.21 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 7.42 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASGX | BACIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.90 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.98 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.39 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.21 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASGX and BACIX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FASGX vs. BACIX - Dividend Comparison
FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than BACIX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 2.05% | 2.79% | 2.63% | 3.39% | 2.49% | 2.67% | 3.66% | 3.06% | 3.43% | 2.76% | 2.38% | 2.51% |
Drawdowns
FASGX vs. BACIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, smaller than the maximum BACIX drawdown of -77.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and BACIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASGX | BACIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.35% | -77.81% | +30.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.07% | -17.60% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.54% | -25.76% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.20% | -65.65% | +38.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -0.46% | -7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -32.59% | +25.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 5.26% | -3.22% |
Volatility
FASGX vs. BACIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) at 4.26%. This indicates that FASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BACIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASGX | BACIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.26% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 11.58% | -3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 21.56% | -8.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 23.61% | -11.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 27.17% | -14.61% |