BACIX vs. NVDA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).

BACIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 15, 2005.

Performance

BACIX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BACIX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	36.34%	11.03%	4.23%	2.97%	43.64%	43.50%	-29.38%	13.04%	-19.55%	2.47%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	-6.48%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACIX achieves a 36.34% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BACIX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 10.55%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.61% annualized return.

BACIX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 10.35%
• YTD: 36.34%
• 6M: 39.26%
• 1Y: 39.36%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 22.91%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

NVDA

• 1D: 5.59%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: -6.48%
• 6M: -6.52%
• 1Y: 60.95%
• 3Y*: 84.54%
• 5Y*: 66.14%
• 10Y*: 69.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BACIX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BACIX

BACIX Risk / Return Rank: 85
BACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BACIX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BACIX	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.48	+0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.17	+0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.27	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	2.92	-0.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.42	7.39	+0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BACIX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACIX and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BACIX	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	1.48	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	1.29	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	1.40	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.61	-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between BACIX and NVDA is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BACIX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

BACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	2.05%	2.79%	2.63%	3.39%	2.49%	2.67%	3.66%	3.06%	3.43%	2.76%	2.38%	2.51%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Drawdowns

BACIX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACIX drawdown since its inception was -77.81%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACIX and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BACIX	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.81%	-89.72%	+11.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.60%	-20.21%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.76%	-66.34%	+40.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.65%	-66.34%	+0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-15.76%	+15.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.59%	-36.40%	+3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	7.99%	-2.73%

Volatility

BACIX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) is 4.26%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that BACIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BACIX	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	10.46%	-6.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	25.91%	-14.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.56%	41.44%	-19.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.61%	51.74%	-28.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.17%	49.85%	-22.68%