FAS vs. MIDU
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and MIDU (Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%) while MIDU tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 21.20%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for MIDU. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MIDU.
Performance
FAS vs. MIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than MIDU's 41.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has outperformed MIDU with an annualized return of 21.20%, while MIDU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.
FAS
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- 12.28%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -13.89%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 21.20%
MIDU
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 41.54%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 74.97%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
FAS vs. MIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -13.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 41.54% | -2.75% | 20.32% | 27.79% | -49.27% | 72.89% | -18.31% | 77.38% | -39.21% | 46.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and MIDU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FAS and MIDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FAS vs. MIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAS
MIDU
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FAS
MIDU
Technology
FAS
MIDU
Industrials
FAS
MIDU
Basic Materials
FAS
-
MIDU
Communication Services
FAS
-
MIDU
Consumer Cyclical
FAS
-
MIDU
Consumer Defensive
FAS
-
MIDU
Energy
FAS
-
MIDU
Healthcare
FAS
-
MIDU
Real Estate
FAS
-
MIDU
Utilities
FAS
-
MIDU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. MIDU — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
MIDU
FAS vs. MIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | MIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.24 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.61 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 8.65 | -8.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. MIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than MIDU's maximum drawdown of -86.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and MIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | MIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -86.26% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | -25.80% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | -60.41% | +17.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | -64.14% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | -86.26% | +0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -1.48% | -19.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.12% | -22.41% | -8.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.97% | 7.77% | +10.20% |
Volatility
FAS vs. MIDU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 12.45%, while Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | MIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.45% | 15.07% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 34.90% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.61% | 47.43% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.59% | 59.59% | -4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.33% | 63.65% | -2.32% |
FAS vs. MIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. MIDU - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than MIDU's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.64% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.63% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.71% | 0.70% | 2.67% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and MIDU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MIDU has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to FAS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs MIDU's -86.26%.
On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 21.20% vs 12.76% for MIDU. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 21.20% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.63% for MIDU.
FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 1.06% for MIDU.
MIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAS and MIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer