FAS vs. SOXL
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 22.42%/yr vs 68.93%/yr for SOXL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
FAS vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -11.10% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 615.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 22.42%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 68.93% annualized return.
FAS
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 10.36%
- YTD
- -11.10%
- 6M
- -14.01%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 41.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- 22.42%
SOXL
- 1D
- 7.69%
- 1M
- 57.83%
- YTD
- 615.61%
- 6M
- 595.26%
- 1Y
- 1,322.96%
- 3Y*
- 141.01%
- 5Y*
- 51.34%
- 10Y*
- 68.93%
FAS vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -11.10% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 615.61% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and SOXL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAS and SOXL has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FAS vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAS
SOXL
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FAS
SOXL
-
Technology
FAS
SOXL
Industrials
FAS
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
FAS
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
FAS
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
FAS
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
FAS
-
SOXL
-
Energy
FAS
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
FAS
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
FAS
-
SOXL
-
Utilities
FAS
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
SOXL
FAS vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.65 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 30.78 | -30.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | 99.38 | -98.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -90.46% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | -43.47% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | -87.88% | +44.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | -90.46% | +23.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | -90.46% | +4.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.43% | 0.00% | -18.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.10% | -34.95% | +3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.14% | 13.44% | +4.70% |
Volatility
FAS vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 12.26%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 62.02%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.26% | 62.02% | -49.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.44% | 96.02% | -62.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.45% | 114.45% | -71.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.35% | 109.85% | -54.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.36% | 100.50% | -39.14% |
FAS vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.38% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and SOXL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (62.02%) compared to FAS (12.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 68.93% vs 22.42% for FAS. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 68.93% return vs 22.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.38%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.72 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAS and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer