FARFX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A (FARFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
FARFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 31, 2007. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
FARFX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FARFX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FARFX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A | -0.13% | 13.15% | 6.30% | 11.55% | -15.86% | 7.73% | 12.80% | 17.23% | -5.29% | 13.98% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FARFX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FARFX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 6.33%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
FARFX
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 8.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.33%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FARFX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FARFX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FARFX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
FARFX
FASGX
FARFX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A (FARFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FARFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.41 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.01 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.00 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 8.74 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FARFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.41 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.71 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FARFX and FASGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FARFX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
FARFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FARFX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A | 2.45% | 2.43% | 2.35% | 2.21% | 4.50% | 4.96% | 3.36% | 3.64% | 6.83% | 24.58% | 2.20% | 4.23% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
FARFX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FARFX drawdown since its inception was -41.46%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARFX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FARFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.46% | -47.35% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.65% | -9.07% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -23.54% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.75% | -27.20% | +5.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -5.77% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -6.74% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 2.07% | -0.72% |
Volatility
FARFX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A (FARFX) is 3.32%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that FARFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FARFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 5.30% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.74% | 8.12% | -3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.67% | 13.00% | -5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.13% | 12.18% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 12.58% | -4.24% |