PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FARFX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FARFX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A (FARFX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FARFX achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FARFX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.68% annualized return.


FARFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
4.40%
6M
4.27%
1Y
12.30%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
6.62%

WFSPX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.77%
6M
8.77%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
15.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FARFX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FARFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A
4.40%13.15%6.30%11.55%-15.86%7.73%12.80%17.23%-5.29%13.98%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
9.77%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FARFX and WFSPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

0.91

The correlation between FARFX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (3 years) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FARFX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FARFX
FARFX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FARFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FARFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FARFX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A (FARFX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FARFXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.01

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

13.58

-3.36

FARFX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FARFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FARFX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FARFX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FARFX drawdown since its inception was -41.46%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARFX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FARFXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.46%

-58.21%

+16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-8.90%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.32%

-18.74%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-24.51%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.75%

-33.74%

+11.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.72%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-12.76%

+7.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.97%

-0.73%

Volatility

FARFX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A (FARFX) is 2.17%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that FARFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FARFXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

4.67%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

9.83%

-4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

12.49%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.20%

16.97%

-8.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.37%

18.07%

-9.70%

FARFX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARFX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FARFX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

FARFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than WFSPX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FARFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A
3.42%2.43%2.35%2.21%4.50%4.96%3.36%3.64%6.83%24.58%2.20%4.23%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.59%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FARFX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFSPX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to FARFX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FARFX dropped -41.46% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FARFX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer