FAMRX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FAMRX (Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, FAMRX returned 11.66%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for FASGX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FAMRX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

FAMRX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMRX achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's 11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMRX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 11.66%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.

FAMRX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 13.38%
• 6M: 14.40%
• 1Y: 29.72%
• 3Y*: 18.82%
• 5Y*: 9.61%
• 10Y*: 11.66%

FASGX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 11.27%
• 6M: 12.13%
• 1Y: 25.26%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMRX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund	13.38%	20.87%	12.60%	18.98%	-18.55%	17.10%	19.37%	26.26%	-9.21%	21.08%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.27%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMRX and FASGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 1999	0.96

The correlation between FAMRX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAMRX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMRX

FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMRX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAMRX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.50	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.50	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.47	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	3.26	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.44	14.40	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAMRX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMRX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAMRX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.50	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.67	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.79	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.63	-0.20

Drawdowns

FAMRX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMRX drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMRX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAMRX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.65%	-47.35%	-11.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-7.95%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.35%	-12.80%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.00%	-23.54%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.96%	-27.20%	-3.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.59%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.32%	-6.71%	-5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.79%	+0.31%

Volatility

FAMRX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 3.37%. This indicates that FAMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAMRX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	3.37%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.94%	8.40%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.27%	10.35%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	12.27%	+2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.26%	12.65%	+2.61%

FAMRX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAMRX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than FASGX's 6.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund	4.90%	5.56%	3.44%	1.33%	5.07%	3.15%	1.99%	5.52%	5.62%	2.31%	0.28%	4.83%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.59%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAMRX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FAMRX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FAMRX or FASGX?

FAMRX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to FASGX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMRX dropped -58.65% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.