FAMRX vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
FAMRX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 24, 1999. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
FAMRX vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAMRX vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund | -0.96% | 20.87% | 12.60% | 18.98% | -18.55% | 17.10% | 19.37% | 26.26% | -9.21% | 21.08% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | -0.59% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 22.60% | -7.86% | 20.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMRX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMRX has outperformed AOA with an annualized return of 10.44%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.
FAMRX
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
AOA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAMRX vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAMRX vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
FAMRX
AOA
FAMRX vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAMRX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.97 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.98 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 8.82 | -0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAMRX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.62 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMRX and AOA is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAMRX vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
FAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than AOA's 2.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund | 5.61% | 5.56% | 3.44% | 1.33% | 5.07% | 3.15% | 1.99% | 5.52% | 5.62% | 2.31% | 0.28% | 4.83% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.19% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
FAMRX vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMRX drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, which is greater than AOA's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMRX and AOA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMRX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.65% | -28.38% | -30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -9.62% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.00% | -23.62% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | -28.38% | -2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -5.18% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -4.08% | -8.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.16% | +0.28% |
Volatility
FAMRX vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 5.28%. This indicates that FAMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAMRX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 5.28% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 8.34% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 13.87% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 12.92% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 13.51% | +1.68% |