FAMKX vs. FFLC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FAMKX (Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A) and FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) are both funds - FAMKX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FFLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FAMKX returned 8.24%/yr vs 15.93%/yr for FFLC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAMKX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLC.

Performance

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMKX achieves a 25.50% return, which is significantly higher than FFLC's 9.11% return.

FAMKX

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 25.50%
• 6M: 26.48%
• 1Y: 52.89%
• 3Y*: 25.80%
• 5Y*: 8.24%
• 10Y*: 12.54%

FFLC

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 9.11%
• 6M: 7.95%
• 1Y: 22.66%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: 15.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A	25.50%	39.76%	9.01%	8.12%	-20.09%	-2.90%	38.74%
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	9.11%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	24.53%	19.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMKX and FFLC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.59

The correlation between FAMKX and FFLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAMKX	FFLC
Technology	31.9%	32.5%
Financial Services	21.7%	11.6%
Industrials	12.5%	11.5%
Communication Services	8.7%	10.9%
Basic Materials	7.8%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	9.7%
Energy	5.4%	4.4%
Healthcare	3.4%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	4.6%
Real Estate	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

FAMKX vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMKX

FAMKX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FAMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FAMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FAMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FAMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FAMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FFLC

FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 55
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAMKX	FFLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	1.69	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.33	+1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.31	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.15	2.28	+1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.82	10.13	+5.69

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMKX and FFLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMKX and FFLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAMKX	FFLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.11%	-19.72%	-50.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.73%	-9.98%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.84%	-19.72%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.80%	-19.72%	-20.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.05%	-2.42%	-3.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.42%	-2.97%	-17.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	2.24%	+1.35%

Volatility

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) at 5.32%. This indicates that FAMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAMKX	FFLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.55%	5.32%	+6.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.49%	10.67%	+7.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.54%	13.54%	+7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.44%	16.99%	+2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.02%	17.68%	+1.34%

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMKX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAMKX vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

FAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than FFLC's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A	1.06%	1.33%	0.74%	1.25%	0.76%	4.87%	1.84%	10.64%	0.17%	0.10%	0.03%
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	1.01%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAMKX and FFLC in my portfolio?

FAMKX and FFLC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAMKX or FFLC?

FAMKX has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to FFLC (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMKX dropped -70.11% vs FFLC's -19.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.