PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAMKX vs. FIQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAMKX vs. FIQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMKX achieves a 20.76% return, which is significantly higher than FIQGX's 17.73% return.


FAMKX

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.51%
6M
9.42%
YTD
20.76%
1Y
42.36%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
9.03%

FIQGX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.35%
6M
8.82%
YTD
17.73%
1Y
33.54%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAMKX vs. FIQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FAMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A
20.76%39.76%9.01%8.12%-20.09%-2.90%30.05%29.29%-3.60%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z
17.73%31.96%-3.54%20.94%-11.74%6.86%17.11%19.81%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMKX and FIQGX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FAMKX and FIQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAMKX vs. FIQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAMKX
FAMKX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FAMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQGX
FIQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FIQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAMKX vs. FIQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAMKXFIQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.46

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

11.71

-2.67

FAMKX vs. FIQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FIQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMKX and FIQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAMKX vs. FIQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than FIQGX's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMKX and FIQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAMKXFIQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.11%

-38.41%

-31.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-9.55%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-17.26%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.99%

-27.36%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

-3.83%

-5.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.36%

-6.83%

-13.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

2.81%

+1.72%

Volatility

FAMKX vs. FIQGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX) at 5.54%. This indicates that FAMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAMKXFIQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

5.54%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.32%

13.13%

+7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.32%

15.08%

+7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.70%

14.42%

+5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

16.84%

+2.34%

FAMKX vs. FIQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMKX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAMKX vs. FIQGX - Dividend Comparison

FAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than FIQGX's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A
1.10%1.33%0.74%1.25%0.76%4.87%1.84%10.64%0.17%0.10%0.03%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z
4.14%4.87%4.07%2.20%1.86%12.04%0.71%1.22%2.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAMKX and FIQGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAMKX has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to FIQGX (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMKX dropped -70.11% vs FIQGX's -38.41%.

FIQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAMKX and FIQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer