FAMKX vs. CNWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX).
FAMKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 29, 2004. CNWIX is managed by Calamos.
Performance
FAMKX vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAMKX vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 0.85% | 39.76% | 9.01% | 8.12% | -20.09% | -2.90% | 30.05% | 29.29% | -18.32% | 46.52% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 4.79% | 19.29% | 14.99% | 6.60% | -24.35% | -4.70% | 54.23% | 20.76% | -17.74% | 36.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMKX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMKX has outperformed CNWIX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while CNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.
FAMKX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -13.15%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
CNWIX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAMKX vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMKX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAMKX vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMKX
CNWIX
FAMKX vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAMKX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.36 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 1.78 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.55 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 6.05 | +2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAMKX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.36 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.12 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.35 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.27 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMKX and CNWIX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAMKX vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison
FAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than CNWIX's 0.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 1.32% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.76% | 4.87% | 1.84% | 10.64% | 0.17% | 0.10% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 2.79% | 2.01% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
FAMKX vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than CNWIX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMKX and CNWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMKX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -43.57% | -26.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -16.28% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.76% | -37.47% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.16% | -43.57% | +1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.73% | -16.28% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -16.56% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 4.17% | -0.62% |
Volatility
FAMKX vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) is 8.51%, while Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that FAMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAMKX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 10.65% | -2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 16.88% | -3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.40% | 20.17% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 17.53% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 24.07% | -5.51% |