FAGAX vs. FDTTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX).
FAGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. FDTTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 30, 1999.
Performance
FAGAX vs. FDTTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGAX vs. FDTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | -13.66% | 22.17% | 38.71% | 45.14% | -38.40% | 11.31% | 68.60% | 40.26% | 14.87% | 34.66% |
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | -5.13% | 27.28% | 26.68% | 23.86% | -8.28% | 24.97% | 8.84% | 30.98% | -9.36% | 16.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGAX achieves a -13.66% return, which is significantly lower than FDTTX's -5.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGAX has outperformed FDTTX with an annualized return of 18.64%, while FDTTX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.37% annualized return.
FAGAX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -13.66%
- 6M
- -12.33%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
FDTTX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGAX vs. FDTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTTX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGAX vs. FDTTX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGAX
FDTTX
FAGAX vs. FDTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGAX | FDTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 1.31 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.87 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.75 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 8.04 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGAX | FDTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.31 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.81 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.77 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGAX and FDTTX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGAX vs. FDTTX - Dividend Comparison
FAGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than FDTTX's 11.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | 4.76% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.19% | 5.45% | 4.10% | 11.99% | 7.67% | 15.44% | 11.12% |
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | 11.35% | 10.77% | 9.20% | 4.34% | 5.64% | 5.60% | 4.40% | 7.49% | 16.04% | 5.52% | 2.74% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
FAGAX vs. FDTTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGAX drawdown since its inception was -65.24%, which is greater than FDTTX's maximum drawdown of -58.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGAX and FDTTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGAX | FDTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.24% | -58.00% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -12.43% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.70% | -21.88% | -22.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.70% | -36.62% | -8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.19% | -9.65% | -6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -11.20% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 2.70% | +1.73% |
Volatility
FAGAX vs. FDTTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) at 4.49%. This indicates that FAGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGAX | FDTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 4.49% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 9.55% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.01% | 18.41% | +5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 17.59% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 18.83% | +4.95% |