PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAGAX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAGAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGAX achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGAX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 22.43%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.77% annualized return.


FAGAX

1D
2.25%
1M
3.98%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.20%
1Y
38.06%
3Y*
30.48%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
22.43%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAGAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAGAX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
16.55%22.17%38.71%45.14%-38.40%11.31%68.60%40.26%14.87%34.66%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGAX and VOO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.88

The correlation between FAGAX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAGAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAGAX
FAGAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FAGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAGAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAGAXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.02

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

13.58

-4.97

FAGAX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGAX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAGAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGAX drawdown since its inception was -65.24%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGAX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAGAXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.24%

-33.99%

-31.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-8.90%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-18.69%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.70%

-24.52%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.70%

-33.99%

-10.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.74%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.18%

-3.68%

-11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

1.98%

+2.42%

Volatility

FAGAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that FAGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAGAXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

4.60%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

9.73%

+6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.66%

12.39%

+7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.03%

16.90%

+8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

18.05%

+5.95%

FAGAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAGAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAGAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FAGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAGAX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
3.52%4.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.19%5.45%4.10%11.99%7.67%15.44%11.12%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAGAX and VOO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAGAX has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGAX dropped -65.24% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAGAX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer