FAB vs. TMVE
FAB (First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - FAB tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAB charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.
Performance
FAB vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 15.00% return.
FAB
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
TMVE
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAB vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 11.59% | 6.12% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 15.00% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAB and TMVE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAB vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank
FAB
TMVE
FAB vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAB | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAB | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 3.25 | -2.90 |
Drawdowns
FAB vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and TMVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAB | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.29% | -8.21% | -55.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -1.55% | -7.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility
FAB vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAB | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 13.98% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 13.98% | +4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 13.98% | +8.08% |
FAB vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAB vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison
FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.58% | 1.57% | 2.00% | 1.94% | 1.80% | 1.32% | 1.59% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.42% | 1.40% | 1.62% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAB and TMVE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FAB.
FAB has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
FAB tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.55% for TMVE.
Find the right allocation for FAB and TMVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer