PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAB vs. SYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAB vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 13.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FAB has underperformed SYLD with an annualized return of 10.39%, while SYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


FAB

1D
-0.79%
1M
0.77%
YTD
10.72%
6M
11.08%
1Y
26.09%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
10.39%

SYLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.34%
YTD
13.63%
6M
12.35%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAB vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
10.72%9.86%7.82%15.81%-6.79%30.83%2.40%23.73%-14.62%14.62%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
13.63%3.94%3.37%16.46%-6.14%48.59%13.61%26.98%-13.51%20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FAB and SYLD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2013

0.92

The correlation between FAB and SYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAB vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAB
SYLD

Financial Services

23.9%
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
22.9%

Industrials

12.0%
8.1%

Energy

8.3%
17.7%

Technology

7.9%
2.3%

Real Estate

7.7%

-

Healthcare

7.1%
5.6%

Utilities

6.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
6.8%

Basic Materials

3.9%
7.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
6.0%

Financial Services

FAB
23.9%
SYLD
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FAB
13.9%
SYLD
22.9%

Industrials

FAB
12.0%
SYLD
8.1%

Energy

FAB
8.3%
SYLD
17.7%

Technology

FAB
7.9%
SYLD
2.3%

Real Estate

FAB
7.7%
SYLD

-

Healthcare

FAB
7.1%
SYLD
5.6%

Utilities

FAB
6.2%
SYLD

-

Consumer Defensive

FAB
5.9%
SYLD
6.8%

Basic Materials

FAB
3.9%
SYLD
7.9%

Communication Services

FAB
2.7%
SYLD
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAB vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAB
FAB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAB vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FABSYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

3.70

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

10.02

+2.22

FAB vs. SYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the SYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAB and SYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FABSYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.65

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.28

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.57

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.57

-0.23

Drawdowns

FAB vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than SYLD's maximum drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and SYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FABSYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.29%

-45.36%

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-6.93%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-26.62%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-26.62%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.08%

-45.36%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-1.31%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-5.66%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.55%

-0.41%

Volatility

FAB vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) have volatilities of 3.15% and 3.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FABSYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

3.13%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

9.94%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

15.55%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

20.62%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

22.96%

-0.90%

FAB vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAB vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison

FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than SYLD's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.59%1.57%2.00%1.94%1.80%1.32%1.59%1.75%1.96%1.42%1.40%1.62%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.86%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FAB and SYLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAB has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to SYLD (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAB dropped -63.29% vs SYLD's -45.36%.

On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 12.98% vs 10.39% for FAB. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FAB.

SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.59% for FAB.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.59% for SYLD.

FAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAB and SYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer