EZPZ vs. FSOL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZPZ is passively managed, while FSOL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FSOL.

Performance

EZPZ vs. FSOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -30.11% return, which is significantly higher than FSOL's -43.45% return.

EZPZ

• 1D: -2.64%
• 1M: -22.06%
• YTD: -30.11%
• 6M: -34.97%
• 1Y: -40.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSOL

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -20.16%
• YTD: -43.45%
• 6M: -49.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZPZ vs. FSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-30.11%	-7.03%
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	-43.45%	-11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and FSOL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. FSOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZPZ vs. FSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZPZ	FSOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZPZ	FSOL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	-1.02	+0.38

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. FSOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -52.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FSOL drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and FSOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	FSOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.87%	-52.59%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.87%	-52.59%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.81%	-29.38%	+7.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	FSOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.85%	71.56%	-24.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.63%	71.56%	-23.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.63%	71.56%	-23.93%

EZPZ vs. FSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FSOL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. FSOL - Dividend Comparison

EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.

Position	TTM
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and FSOL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, EZPZ and FSOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or FSOL?

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or FSOL?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FSOL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or FSOL?

FSOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and FSOL?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.25% for FSOL.