EZPZ vs. ETCG

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price while ETCG tracks the Ethereum Classic (ETC). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -45.45% vs -66.30% for ETCG. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ETCG.

Performance

EZPZ vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -28.79% return, which is significantly higher than ETCG's -48.04% return.

EZPZ

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: -13.59%
• YTD: -28.79%
• 1Y: -45.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.43%

ETCG

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -14.11%
• 6M: -31.84%
• YTD: -48.04%
• 1Y: -66.30%
• 3Y*: -20.31%
• 5Y*: -37.40%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -22.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	$62.80K	$56.20K	$101.80K
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	$92.79K	$145.26K	$218.28K

EZPZ vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-28.79%	-10.11%
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	-48.04%	-36.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and ETCG is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.69

The correlation between EZPZ and ETCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ETCG

ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 1
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 0
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZPZ vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZPZ	ETCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	-1.16	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	-2.29	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.76	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.91	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	-1.28	+0.07

EZPZ vs. ETCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is comparable to the ETCG Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZPZ and ETCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and ETCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	ETCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.63%	-96.59%	+39.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.63%	-72.70%	+16.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-82.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-92.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.98%	-96.24%	+44.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.36%	-82.90%	+57.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.54%	51.68%	-14.14%

Volatility

EZPZ vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) is 8.25%, while Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that EZPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	ETCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	9.74%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.13%	33.36%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.70%	57.23%	-9.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.78%	90.69%	-43.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.78%	114.24%	-67.46%

EZPZ vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZPZ nor ETCG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and ETCG in my portfolio?

EZPZ and ETCG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZPZ or ETCG?

ETCG has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to EZPZ (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -56.63% vs ETCG's -96.59%.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or ETCG?

On 1-year performance, EZPZ leads with -45.45% vs -66.30% for ETCG. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZPZ or ETCG?

Over the 1-year period, EZPZ has performed better with a -45.45% return vs -66.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or ETCG?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or ETCG?

EZPZ and ETCG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and ETCG?

EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 2.50% for ETCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.