EZMO vs. PTH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EZMO (AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. EZMO is actively managed, while PTH is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EZMO charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTH.

Performance

EZMO vs. PTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF (EZMO) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZMO achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than PTH's 17.14% return.

EZMO

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -2.15%
• 6M: -4.53%
• YTD: -1.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTH

• 1D: -2.68%
• 1M: 12.36%
• 6M: 17.65%
• YTD: 17.14%
• 1Y: 56.88%
• 3Y*: 14.27%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: 14.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZMO vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF	-1.68%	4.05%
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	17.14%	10.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EZMO and PTH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

EZMO vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZMO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PTH

PTH Risk / Return Rank: 86
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZMO vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF (EZMO) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZMO	PTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.35	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.77	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.03	—

Drawdowns

EZMO vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZMO drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZMO and PTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZMO	PTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-53.52%	+40.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.98%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.91%	-5.60%	-5.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-16.95%	+11.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZMO	PTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.37%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.94%	24.34%	-7.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	25.68%	-8.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	27.33%	-10.39%

EZMO vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZMO has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PTH's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZMO vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison

EZMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	2.62%	3.07%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZMO and PTH in my portfolio?

EZMO and PTH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EZMO or PTH?

On fees, PTH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZMO or PTH?

PTH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for EZMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZMO or PTH?

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for EZMO.

What is the main difference between EZMO and PTH?

They also come from different issuers: AlphaDroid and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for EZMO and 0.60% for PTH.