EZMO vs. PTF
EZMO (AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF) and PTF (Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. EZMO is actively managed, while PTF is passively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EZMO charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.
Performance
EZMO vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZMO achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 28.31% return.
EZMO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PTF
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -13.47%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- YTD
- 28.31%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- 14.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $253.93K | $173.70K | $167.73K | |
| $24.83M | $20.96M | $16.60M |
EZMO vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | -3.36% | 4.05% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 28.31% | -6.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZMO and PTF is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZMO vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
EZMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PTF
EZMO vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF (EZMO) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZMO | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZMO vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZMO drawdown since its inception was -15.45%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZMO and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZMO | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.45% | -55.38% | +39.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.43% | -29.07% | +16.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -13.29% | +7.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.54% | — |
Volatility
EZMO vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZMO | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 50.91% | -33.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 37.96% | -20.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 34.57% | -17.36% |
EZMO vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZMO has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZMO vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
EZMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZMO and PTF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for EZMO.
PTF has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for EZMO.
They also come from different issuers: AlphaDroid and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for EZMO and 0.60% for PTF.
Find the right allocation for EZMO and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer