EZMO vs. UIVM
EZMO (AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF) and UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. EZMO is actively managed, while UIVM is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZMO charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for UIVM.
Performance
EZMO vs. UIVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZMO achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than UIVM's 16.17% return.
EZMO
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIVM
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 31.38%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- —
EZMO vs. UIVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | -1.68% | 4.05% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 16.17% | 6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZMO and UIVM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZMO vs. UIVM — Risk / Return Rank
EZMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UIVM
EZMO vs. UIVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF (EZMO) and VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZMO | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZMO vs. UIVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZMO drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum UIVM drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZMO and UIVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZMO | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -42.73% | +29.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.91% | -0.50% | -10.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -9.60% | +4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility
EZMO vs. UIVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZMO | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 15.48% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 15.58% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 17.22% | -0.28% |
EZMO vs. UIVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZMO has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than UIVM's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZMO vs. UIVM - Dividend Comparison
EZMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.15% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZMO and UIVM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for EZMO.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.00% for EZMO.
They also come from different issuers: AlphaDroid and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for EZMO and 0.35% for UIVM.
Find the right allocation for EZMO and UIVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer