PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZM vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZM vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EZM having a 10.64% annualized return and USL not far ahead at 10.91%.


EZM

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.53%
6M
10.32%
1Y
23.17%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
10.64%

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZM vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
10.53%8.42%10.29%19.69%-12.22%31.00%5.57%24.48%-12.36%17.37%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EZM and USL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.32

The correlation between EZM and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EZM vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZM
USL

Financial Services

19.3%
4.5%

Industrials

16.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%

-

Technology

12.5%

-

Healthcare

9.2%

-

Energy

7.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.4%

-

Real Estate

4.9%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Financial Services

EZM
19.3%
USL
4.5%

Industrials

EZM
16.5%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

EZM
15.4%
USL

-

Technology

EZM
12.5%
USL

-

Healthcare

EZM
9.2%
USL

-

Energy

EZM
7.2%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

EZM
5.4%
USL

-

Real Estate

EZM
4.9%
USL

-

Basic Materials

EZM
4.4%
USL

-

Utilities

EZM
3.3%
USL

-

Communication Services

EZM
1.8%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZM vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZM
EZM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZM vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZMUSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

2.04

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.58

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.47

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.07

7.02

+2.05

EZM vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZM and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZMUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.04

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.58

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.34

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.01

+0.40

Drawdowns

EZM vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZMUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.58%

-89.06%

+29.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-16.76%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-23.33%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.53%

-33.82%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.26%

-66.02%

+18.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-38.16%

+38.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-61.46%

+53.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

8.27%

-5.71%

Volatility

EZM vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) is 3.55%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that EZM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZMUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

10.53%

-6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

23.33%

-13.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

28.54%

-13.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

30.08%

-9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

32.35%

-9.99%

EZM vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZM vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
1.26%1.39%1.22%1.25%1.57%1.08%1.67%1.34%1.57%1.14%1.55%1.30%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZM and USL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to EZM (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, USL leads with 10.91% vs 10.64% for EZM. On fees, EZM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EZM has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USL has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

EZM has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

EZM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZM and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer