PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZM vs. MDYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZM vs. MDYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than MDYV's 10.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EZM having a 11.19% annualized return and MDYV not far behind at 10.80%.


EZM

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.64%
YTD
11.89%
6M
10.26%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
11.19%

MDYV

1D
-0.38%
1M
2.88%
YTD
10.67%
6M
9.08%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZM vs. MDYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
11.89%8.42%10.29%19.69%-12.22%31.00%5.57%24.48%-12.36%17.37%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
10.67%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EZM and MDYV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2007

0.88

The correlation between EZM and MDYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZM vs. MDYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZM
MDYV

Financial Services

19.0%
21.4%

Industrials

16.4%
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

15.2%
13.9%

Technology

13.6%
10.2%

Healthcare

9.9%
3.8%

Energy

6.4%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.9%

Real Estate

5.0%
9.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
6.3%

Utilities

3.2%
4.0%

Communication Services

1.9%
0.5%

Financial Services

EZM
19.0%
MDYV
21.4%

Industrials

EZM
16.4%
MDYV
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EZM
15.2%
MDYV
13.9%

Technology

EZM
13.6%
MDYV
10.2%

Healthcare

EZM
9.9%
MDYV
3.8%

Energy

EZM
6.4%
MDYV
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

EZM
5.1%
MDYV
4.9%

Real Estate

EZM
5.0%
MDYV
9.6%

Basic Materials

EZM
4.4%
MDYV
6.3%

Utilities

EZM
3.2%
MDYV
4.0%

Communication Services

EZM
1.9%
MDYV
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZM vs. MDYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZM
EZM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZM vs. MDYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EZMMDYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.96

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

6.75

+2.61

EZM vs. MDYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the MDYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZM and MDYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EZM vs. MDYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, roughly equal to the maximum MDYV drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and MDYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZMMDYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.58%

-60.71%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-10.53%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-22.58%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.53%

-22.58%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.26%

-45.90%

-1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-1.18%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-8.60%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.05%

-0.49%

Volatility

EZM vs. MDYV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) have volatilities of 4.05% and 3.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZMMDYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.91%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

10.72%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

15.36%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

19.45%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.33%

21.88%

+0.45%

EZM vs. MDYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MDYV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZM vs. MDYV - Dividend Comparison

EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than MDYV's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
1.25%1.39%1.22%1.25%1.57%1.08%1.67%1.34%1.57%1.14%1.55%1.30%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.71%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EZM and MDYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZM has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to MDYV (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs MDYV's -60.71%.

On 10-year performance, EZM leads with 11.19% vs 10.80% for MDYV. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZM has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EZM.

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.25% for EZM.

EZM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MDYV is Mid Cap Value Equities. EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.15% for MDYV.

EZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZM and MDYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer