PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZM vs. JHQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZM vs. JHQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than JHQAX's -1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, EZM has outperformed JHQAX with an annualized return of 11.24%, while JHQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.75% annualized return.


EZM

1D
0.21%
1M
3.10%
YTD
12.38%
6M
10.19%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
11.24%

JHQAX

1D
0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-2.05%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZM vs. JHQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
12.38%8.42%10.29%19.69%-12.22%31.00%5.57%24.48%-12.36%17.37%
JHQAX
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund
-1.67%7.22%17.93%15.78%-8.27%13.13%13.77%13.38%-0.93%12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EZM and JHQAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014

0.75

The correlation between EZM and JHQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZM vs. JHQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZM
EZM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

JHQAX
JHQAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
JHQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
JHQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZM vs. JHQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EZMJHQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

0.89

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

2.91

+7.06

EZM vs. JHQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the JHQAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZM and JHQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EZM vs. JHQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than JHQAX's maximum drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and JHQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZMJHQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.58%

-18.82%

-40.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-6.91%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-13.11%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.53%

-14.48%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.26%

-18.82%

-28.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-2.93%

+2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-2.22%

-6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.11%

+0.45%

Volatility

EZM vs. JHQAX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX) at 0.51%. This indicates that EZM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZMJHQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

0.51%

+3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

4.66%

+5.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.08%

6.27%

+8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

8.86%

+11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

9.37%

+13.00%

EZM vs. JHQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than JHQAX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZM vs. JHQAX - Dividend Comparison

EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than JHQAX's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
1.24%1.39%1.22%1.25%1.57%1.08%1.67%1.34%1.57%1.14%1.55%1.30%
JHQAX
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund
0.37%0.41%0.51%0.74%0.74%0.50%0.89%1.18%0.92%0.76%1.11%0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZM and JHQAX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZM has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to JHQAX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs JHQAX's -18.82%.

EZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZM and JHQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer