EZJ vs. XPP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EZJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index (200%) while XPP tracks the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZJ returned 11.13%/yr vs -5.00%/yr for XPP. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EZJ vs. XPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 24.65% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -19.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has outperformed XPP with an annualized return of 11.13%, while XPP has yielded a comparatively lower -5.00% annualized return.

EZJ

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 6M: 23.79%
• 1Y: 53.47%
• 3Y*: 22.06%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

XPP

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -15.80%
• YTD: -19.06%
• 6M: -20.73%
• 1Y: -14.63%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: -20.00%
• 10Y*: -5.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZJ vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	24.65%	42.72%	3.31%	30.78%	-38.23%	-1.96%	22.21%	33.76%	-30.99%	49.10%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	-19.06%	45.84%	38.18%	-34.77%	-50.06%	-40.45%	7.07%	24.88%	-31.36%	80.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EZJ and XPP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009	0.50

The correlation between EZJ and XPP shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EZJ vs. XPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZJ	XPP
Industrials	26.0%	-
Technology	19.1%	-
Financial Services	17.6%	43.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	-
Communication Services	7.9%	-
Healthcare	6.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.0%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Energy	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

EZJ vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZJ

EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 43
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

XPP

XPP Risk / Return Rank: 6
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZJ vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZJ	XPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	-0.37	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	-0.29	+2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.97	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	-0.43	+2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.06	-0.87	+6.93

EZJ vs. XPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the XPP Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZJ and XPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZJ vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and XPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZJ	XPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.63%	-89.90%	+31.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.78%	-34.03%	+7.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.48%	-52.95%	+21.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.63%	-85.24%	+26.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.63%	-89.90%	+31.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.32%	-78.58%	+71.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.26%	-47.86%	+26.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.86%	16.88%	-8.02%

Volatility

EZJ vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) have volatilities of 12.82% and 12.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZJ	XPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.82%	12.76%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.61%	28.73%	+3.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.13%	39.23%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.89%	62.75%	-25.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.65%	54.86%	-20.21%

EZJ vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EZJ and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EZJ vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison

EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than XPP's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	1.66%	1.13%	2.09%	1.11%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%	4.49%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	2.68%	2.32%	2.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.81%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZJ and XPP in my portfolio?

EZJ and XPP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZJ or XPP?

EZJ has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to XPP (12.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs XPP's -89.90%.

Which ETF is better, EZJ or XPP?

On 10-year performance, EZJ leads with 11.13% vs -5.00% for XPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZJ or XPP?

Over the 10-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 11.13% return vs -5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZJ or XPP?

EZJ and XPP have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZJ or XPP?

XPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.66% for EZJ.

What is the main difference between EZJ and XPP?

EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.