EZJ vs. DXJ
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EZJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%), while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZJ returned 11.50%/yr vs 19.15%/yr for DXJ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZJ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
EZJ vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 36.16% return, which is significantly higher than DXJ's 23.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 11.50%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.15% annualized return.
EZJ
- 1D
- 4.51%
- 1M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 36.16%
- 6M
- 36.73%
- 1Y
- 70.65%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
DXJ
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 23.83%
- 6M
- 23.80%
- 1Y
- 59.50%
- 3Y*
- 32.22%
- 5Y*
- 27.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.15%
EZJ vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 36.16% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -30.99% | 49.10% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 23.83% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and DXJ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009 | 0.79 |
The correlation between EZJ and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZJ vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZJ
DXJ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
EZJ
DXJ
Technology
EZJ
DXJ
Financial Services
EZJ
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
EZJ
DXJ
Communication Services
EZJ
DXJ
Healthcare
EZJ
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
EZJ
DXJ
Basic Materials
EZJ
DXJ
Real Estate
EZJ
DXJ
-
Utilities
EZJ
DXJ
Energy
EZJ
DXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
DXJ
EZJ vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZJ | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.60 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 5.45 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 21.13 | -13.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -49.63% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -10.98% | -15.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -22.19% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | -22.19% | -36.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -39.14% | -19.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -14.31% | -6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.85% | 2.83% | +6.02% |
Volatility
EZJ vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a higher volatility of 13.35% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.92%. This indicates that EZJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.35% | 4.92% | +8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.91% | 13.56% | +19.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.37% | 17.79% | +23.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.93% | 19.01% | +17.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.69% | 20.17% | +14.52% |
EZJ vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZJ vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than DXJ's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.04% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.52% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and DXJ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZJ has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to DXJ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 19.15% vs 11.50% for EZJ. On fees, DXJ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 19.15% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXJ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.
EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.04% for DXJ.
EZJ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer