EZET vs. ETCO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZET is passively managed, while ETCO is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for ETCO.

Performance

EZET vs. ETCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -40.23% return, which is significantly lower than ETCO's -34.48% return.

EZET

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -25.14%
• YTD: -40.23%
• 6M: -43.56%
• 1Y: -32.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETCO

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: -22.34%
• YTD: -34.48%
• 6M: -36.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. ETCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-40.23%	-30.60%
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF	-34.48%	-24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and ETCO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025	0.95

Return for Risk

EZET vs. ETCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 5
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. ETCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZET	ETCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZET	ETCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-1.17	+0.75

Drawdowns

EZET vs. ETCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, which is greater than ETCO's maximum drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and ETCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	ETCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.05%	-56.81%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.36%	-55.08%	-8.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.74%	-34.54%	+1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZET	ETCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.34%	52.38%	+15.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.29%	52.38%	+19.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.29%	52.38%	+19.91%

EZET vs. ETCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCO's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZET vs. ETCO - Dividend Comparison

EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 129.56%.

Position	TTM	2025
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF	129.56%	42.29%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and ETCO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, EZET and ETCO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EZET or ETCO?

On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or ETCO?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ETCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or ETCO?

ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 129.56%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between EZET and ETCO?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.66% for ETCO.