PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXOSX vs. MNDFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXOSX vs. MNDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXOSX achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than MNDFX's 11.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EXOSX has outperformed MNDFX with an annualized return of 7.43%, while MNDFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.


EXOSX

1D
0.43%
1M
0.86%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
7.43%

MNDFX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.06%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.94%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
5.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXOSX vs. MNDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXOSX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series
2.14%16.21%3.33%19.89%-24.26%11.50%27.07%27.52%-17.23%23.92%
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
11.45%15.76%11.60%5.64%-4.22%22.45%2.44%-28.95%-4.30%23.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EXOSX and MNDFX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between EXOSX and MNDFX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXOSX vs. MNDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXOSX
EXOSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EXOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EXOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

MNDFX
MNDFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MNDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXOSX vs. MNDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXOSXMNDFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

2.61

-2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

3.87

-3.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.47

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

4.36

-3.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.03

15.66

-13.63

EXOSX vs. MNDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXOSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the MNDFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXOSX and MNDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXOSXMNDFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.61

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.61

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.24

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.41

-0.01

Drawdowns

EXOSX vs. MNDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXOSX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, smaller than the maximum MNDFX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXOSX and MNDFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXOSXMNDFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.50%

-62.03%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-6.70%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-16.04%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.71%

-17.87%

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.71%

-62.03%

+24.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-0.63%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.07%

-12.01%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

1.87%

+1.51%

Volatility

EXOSX vs. MNDFX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) at 2.61%. This indicates that EXOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXOSXMNDFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

2.61%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

8.16%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

11.34%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

14.49%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.69%

21.67%

-4.98%

EXOSX vs. MNDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXOSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MNDFX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXOSX vs. MNDFX - Dividend Comparison

EXOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than MNDFX's 8.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXOSX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series
1.11%1.13%1.29%1.27%0.82%1.85%0.86%1.72%0.91%1.79%1.71%1.84%
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
8.82%9.64%10.46%7.81%9.77%7.31%1.93%5.18%15.02%24.95%4.89%15.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXOSX and MNDFX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXOSX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to MNDFX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXOSX dropped -55.50% vs MNDFX's -62.03%.

MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXOSX and MNDFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer