PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXHAX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXHAX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has outperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 9.92%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.


EXHAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
2.54%
YTD
2.10%
6M
3.05%
1Y
11.89%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
9.92%

MHELX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
17.65%
6M
20.19%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXHAX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXHAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series
2.10%12.05%11.86%19.08%-20.33%18.37%22.11%27.69%-6.52%24.27%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
17.65%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EXHAX and MHELX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 1998

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between EXHAX and MHELX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXHAX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXHAX
EXHAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EXHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EXHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXHAX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXHAXMHELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

2.06

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

2.92

-1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.39

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

4.64

-3.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.36

15.69

-12.33

EXHAX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXHAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXHAX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXHAXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.06

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.24

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.43

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.33

+0.10

Drawdowns

EXHAX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXHAXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-61.24%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.33%

-8.52%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.05%

-30.81%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

-32.01%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.53%

-39.02%

+9.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-0.60%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-12.93%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

2.51%

+1.06%

Volatility

EXHAX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) is 3.15%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that EXHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXHAXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

4.53%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

15.24%

-5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

19.23%

-7.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

21.00%

-6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

20.97%

-5.69%

EXHAX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXHAX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than MHELX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXHAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series
10.40%10.62%6.41%2.13%10.95%6.01%3.28%5.21%10.32%7.83%2.08%1.27%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.13%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXHAX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to EXHAX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXHAX dropped -51.96% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXHAX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer