EXCRX vs. EXBAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EXCRX (Manning & Napier Core Bond Series) and EXBAX (Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series) are both mutual funds - EXCRX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Manning & Napier, while EXBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Manning & Napier. Over the past 10 years, EXCRX returned 1.45%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for EXBAX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EXCRX charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for EXBAX.

Performance

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXCRX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than EXBAX's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EXCRX has underperformed EXBAX with an annualized return of 1.45%, while EXBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.66% annualized return.

EXCRX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: 3.68%
• 5Y*: -0.22%
• 10Y*: 1.45%

EXBAX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 6.61%
• 3Y*: 6.99%
• 5Y*: 2.54%
• 10Y*: 5.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series	0.33%	6.82%	1.05%	5.47%	-13.20%	-1.89%	8.66%	8.18%	-0.74%	2.91%
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series	0.90%	9.29%	6.11%	11.13%	-14.52%	7.97%	14.96%	16.15%	-3.54%	11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EXCRX and EXBAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2005	0.17

Over the past year, EXCRX and EXBAX have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

EXCRX vs. EXBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXCRX

EXCRX Risk / Return Rank: 16
EXCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
EXCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
EXCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
EXCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
EXCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

EXBAX

EXBAX Risk / Return Rank: 14
EXBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
EXBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
EXBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
EXBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EXBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EXCRX	EXBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.02	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	1.49	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.18	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	0.99	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.90	3.90	0.00

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXCRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the EXBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXCRX and EXBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXCRX drawdown since its inception was -18.70%, smaller than the maximum EXBAX drawdown of -29.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCRX and EXBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXCRX	EXBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.70%	-29.86%	+11.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.10%	-7.37%	+4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.03%	-7.52%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.65%	-19.23%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.70%	-19.23%	+0.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-1.35%	-1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-5.05%	+2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	1.87%	-0.80%

Volatility

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) is 1.12%, while Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that EXCRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EXCRX	EXBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	2.67%	-1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	6.05%	-3.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.99%	7.21%	-3.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.91%	7.65%	-1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.86%	7.69%	-2.83%

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXCRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EXBAX's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Dividend Comparison

EXCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than EXBAX's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series	5.72%	5.77%	4.57%	2.27%	0.99%	6.67%	6.31%	4.83%	5.08%	6.09%	1.81%	0.58%
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series	4.23%	4.18%	3.82%	3.64%	2.23%	2.28%	5.15%	2.01%	2.32%	1.94%	2.14%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EXCRX and EXBAX in my portfolio?

EXCRX and EXBAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EXCRX or EXBAX?

EXBAX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to EXCRX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXCRX dropped -18.70% vs EXBAX's -29.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EXCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.