PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXCRX vs. EXBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXCRX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than EXBAX's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EXCRX has underperformed EXBAX with an annualized return of 1.28%, while EXBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.39% annualized return.


EXCRX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.92%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-0.55%
1Y
1.60%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
1.28%
ALL TIME*
3.20%

EXBAX

1D
0.76%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.88%
YTD
2.14%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
5.39%
ALL TIME*
4.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXCRX
Manning & Napier Core Bond Series
-0.55%6.82%1.05%5.47%-13.20%-1.89%8.66%8.18%-0.74%2.91%
EXBAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series
2.14%9.29%6.11%11.13%-14.52%7.97%14.96%16.15%-3.54%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EXCRX and EXBAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2005

0.17

Over the past year, EXCRX and EXBAX have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXCRX vs. EXBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EXCRX
EXCRX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EXCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EXCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

EXBAX
EXBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EXBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EXBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXCRXEXBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.15

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.84

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.04

3.28

-1.24

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXCRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the EXBAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXCRX and EXBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXCRX drawdown since its inception was -18.70%, smaller than the maximum EXBAX drawdown of -29.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCRX and EXBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXCRXEXBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.70%

-29.86%

+11.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-7.37%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.93%

-7.52%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-19.23%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.70%

-19.23%

+0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-0.34%

-3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-5.04%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.89%

-0.67%

Volatility

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) is 1.07%, while Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that EXCRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXCRXEXBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

2.01%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.18%

6.10%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

7.33%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.92%

7.69%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.87%

7.66%

-2.79%

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXCRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EXBAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Dividend Comparison

EXCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than EXBAX's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXBAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series
6.71%5.77%4.57%2.27%0.99%6.67%6.31%4.83%5.08%6.09%1.81%0.58%
EXCRX
Manning & Napier Core Bond Series
4.32%4.18%3.82%3.64%2.23%2.28%5.15%2.01%2.32%1.94%2.14%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXCRX and EXBAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXBAX has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to EXCRX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXCRX dropped -18.70% vs EXBAX's -29.86%.

EXBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXCRX and EXBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer