EXCRX vs. EXBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX).
EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005. EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993.
Performance
EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.06% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -3.39% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -14.52% | 7.97% | 14.96% | 16.15% | -3.54% | 11.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXCRX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than EXBAX's -3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EXCRX has underperformed EXBAX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while EXBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.24% annualized return.
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
EXBAX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 6M
- -1.52%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXCRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EXBAX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXCRX vs. EXBAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXCRX
EXBAX
EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXCRX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.61 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 0.92 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.68 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 2.93 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXCRX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.61 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.31 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.69 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.45 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXCRX and EXBAX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Dividend Comparison
EXCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than EXBAX's 5.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 5.97% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXCRX drawdown since its inception was -18.70%, smaller than the maximum EXBAX drawdown of -29.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCRX and EXBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXCRX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -29.86% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -7.37% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -19.23% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.70% | -19.23% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -5.54% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -5.07% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 1.70% | -0.59% |
Volatility
EXCRX vs. EXBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) is 1.79%, while Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that EXCRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXCRX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 3.47% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 5.24% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 8.03% | -3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 7.53% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 7.61% | -2.78% |