EXEQ vs. SPXM
EXEQ (Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. EXEQ is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. EXEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
EXEQ vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EXEQ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EXEQ vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EXEQ Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 9.33% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXEQ vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF (EXEQ) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXEQ vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.92%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXEQ and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXEQ | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -5.08% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.75% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -0.78% | -0.99% |
Volatility
EXEQ vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXEQ | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.21% | 7.72% | +7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 7.72% | +7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 7.72% | +7.49% |
EXEQ vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXEQ vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
EXEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EXEQ Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 0.09% | 0.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EXEQ.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.09% for EXEQ.
They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EXEQ and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for EXEQ and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer