PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXEQ vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXEQ vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF (EXEQ) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EXEQ

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.22%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXLC

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.62%
6M
8.69%
YTD
10.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXEQ vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EXEQ and GXLC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXEQ vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF (EXEQ) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EXEQ vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXEQ vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.92%, roughly equal to the maximum GXLC drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXEQ and GXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXEQGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-9.08%

+0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-1.31%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-1.57%

-0.20%

Volatility

EXEQ vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXEQGXLCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

13.68%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

13.68%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

13.68%

+1.53%

EXEQ vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXEQ vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

EXEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than GXLC's 0.63% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EXEQ and GXLC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EXEQ.

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.09% for EXEQ.

EXEQ tracks Solactive Indiggo ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EXEQ and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXEQ and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer