EXEQ vs. SCHX
EXEQ (Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - EXEQ tracks the Solactive Indiggo ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EXEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
EXEQ vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EXEQ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 21.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
EXEQ vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EXEQ Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 9.33% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXEQ and SCHX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXEQ vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
EXEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHX
EXEQ vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF (EXEQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXEQ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXEQ vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXEQ and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXEQ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -34.33% | +25.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -1.18% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -3.96% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
EXEQ vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXEQ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.21% | 12.65% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 17.24% | -2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 18.13% | -2.92% |
EXEQ vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXEQ vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
EXEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SCHX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXEQ Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXEQ and SCHX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EXEQ.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.09% for EXEQ.
EXEQ tracks Solactive Indiggo ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EXEQ and 0.03% for SCHX.
Find the right allocation for EXEQ and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer