EXC vs. NOA
EXC (Exelon Corporation) and NOA (North American Construction Group Ltd) are both stocks. EXC operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while NOA operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, EXC returned 9.62%/yr vs 20.25%/yr for NOA. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EXC vs. NOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXC achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than NOA's -4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EXC has underperformed NOA with an annualized return of 9.62%, while NOA has yielded a comparatively higher 20.25% annualized return.
EXC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.97%
NOA
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- YTD
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- -6.67%
- 3Y*
- -16.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 20.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $454.24M | $436.53M | $409.53M | |
| $634.03K | $742.97K | $1.48M |
EXC vs. NOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXC Exelon Corporation | 7.01% | 20.02% | 10.29% | -13.96% | 8.29% | 41.48% | -3.87% | 4.27% | 18.33% | 15.08% |
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd | -4.18% | -31.98% | 5.16% | 58.49% | -9.78% | 54.32% | -17.24% | 37.27% | 81.63% | 30.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXC and NOA is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2006 | 0.17 |
The correlation between EXC and NOA shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EXC:
$46.88B
NOA:
$368.59M
EXC:
$2.73
NOA:
CA$1.12
EXC:
16.78
NOA:
17.02
EXC:
1.84
NOA:
0.45
EXC:
1.59
NOA:
1.14
EXC:
$25.33B
NOA:
CA$1.26B
EXC:
$6.22B
NOA:
CA$166.23M
EXC:
$9.06B
NOA:
CA$324.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXC vs. NOA — Risk / Return Rank
EXC
NOA
EXC vs. NOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exelon Corporation (EXC) and North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXC | NOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.26 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | -0.48 | +1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXC vs. NOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXC drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, smaller than the maximum NOA drawdown of -93.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXC and NOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXC | NOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.27% | -93.59% | +31.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.74% | -28.32% | +14.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.89% | -50.67% | +31.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -50.67% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.04% | -68.41% | +28.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -43.86% | +35.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -55.58% | +35.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.11% | 15.25% | -9.14% |
Volatility
EXC vs. NOA - Volatility Comparison
Exelon Corporation (EXC) and North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) have volatilities of 7.31% and 7.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXC | NOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 7.53% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.73% | 40.42% | -24.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.11% | 50.67% | -31.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 41.47% | -20.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 45.85% | -21.87% |
Dividends
EXC vs. NOA - Dividend Comparison
EXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than NOA's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXC Exelon Corporation | 3.58% | 3.67% | 5.05% | 4.01% | 3.12% | 2.65% | 3.62% | 3.18% | 3.06% | 3.32% | 3.56% | 4.47% |
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd | 2.55% | 2.39% | 1.42% | 1.54% | 1.84% | 0.85% | 1.21% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 4.62% |
Financials
EXC vs. NOA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exelon Corporation and North American Construction Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EXC vs. NOA - Profitability Comparison
EXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exelon Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
NOA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 42.36M and revenue of 320.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.2%.
EXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exelon Corporation reported an operating income of 979.00M and revenue of 5.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
NOA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported an operating income of 21.87M and revenue of 320.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
EXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exelon Corporation reported a net income of 396.00M and revenue of 5.97B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
NOA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a net income of 5.57M and revenue of 320.04M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EXC and NOA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOA has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to EXC (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXC dropped -62.27% vs NOA's -93.59%.
EXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EXC and NOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer