NOA vs. USAC
Compare and contrast key facts about North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC).
Performance
NOA vs. USAC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NOA vs. USAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd | -6.81% | -31.98% | 5.16% | 58.49% | -9.78% | 54.32% | -17.24% | 37.27% | 81.63% | 30.91% |
USAC USA Compression Partners, LP | 22.87% | 6.38% | 12.67% | 28.80% | 25.91% | 45.90% | -10.09% | 57.91% | -11.29% | 8.05% |
Fundamentals
NOA:
$375.86M
USAC:
$3.44B
NOA:
$1.09
USAC:
$0.91
NOA:
12.21
USAC:
30.39
NOA:
0.32
USAC:
3.39
NOA:
$1.28B
USAC:
$998.10M
NOA:
$161.75M
USAC:
$384.48M
NOA:
$329.71M
USAC:
$602.95M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOA achieves a -6.81% return, which is significantly lower than USAC's 22.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NOA having a 22.87% annualized return and USAC not far ahead at 23.33%.
NOA
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -20.52%
- YTD
- -6.81%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- -14.88%
- 3Y*
- -5.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- 22.87%
USAC
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 26.21%
- 10Y*
- 23.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOA vs. USAC — Risk / Return Rank
NOA
USAC
NOA vs. USAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOA | USAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | 0.38 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | 0.72 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.09 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.59 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 1.33 | -2.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOA | USAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 0.38 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.93 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.54 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.36 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between NOA and USAC is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NOA vs. USAC - Dividend Comparison
NOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than USAC's 7.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd | 2.60% | 2.39% | 1.42% | 1.54% | 1.84% | 0.85% | 1.21% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 4.62% |
USAC USA Compression Partners, LP | 7.59% | 9.13% | 8.91% | 9.20% | 10.75% | 12.03% | 15.44% | 11.58% | 16.18% | 12.70% | 12.14% | 18.06% |
Drawdowns
NOA vs. USAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOA drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, which is greater than USAC's maximum drawdown of -78.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOA and USAC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOA | USAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.59% | -78.96% | -14.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.31% | -20.12% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.67% | -24.39% | -26.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.41% | -78.96% | +10.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.40% | -3.45% | -41.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.82% | -12.83% | -42.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.11% | 8.88% | +8.23% |
Volatility
NOA vs. USAC - Volatility Comparison
North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a higher volatility of 34.87% compared to USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) at 6.18%. This indicates that NOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NOA | USAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.87% | 6.18% | +28.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.94% | 17.80% | +24.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.99% | 29.29% | +22.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.45% | 28.36% | +14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.20% | 43.03% | +3.17% |
Financials
NOA vs. USAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between North American Construction Group Ltd and USA Compression Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NOA vs. USAC - Profitability Comparison
NOA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 38.31M and revenue of 305.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.
USAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, USA Compression Partners, LP reported a gross profit of -116.07M and revenue of 252.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -46.0%.
NOA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported an operating income of 21.21M and revenue of 305.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
USAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, USA Compression Partners, LP reported an operating income of 78.50M and revenue of 252.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.1%.
NOA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a net income of 124.90K and revenue of 305.33M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
USAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, USA Compression Partners, LP reported a net income of 27.76M and revenue of 252.48M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.