NOA vs. BIZD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NOA (North American Construction Group Ltd) is a stock, while BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Over the past 10 years, NOA returned 19.26%/yr vs 7.97%/yr for BIZD. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NOA vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOA achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -6.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NOA has outperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 19.26%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.97% annualized return.

NOA

• 1D: 4.58%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: 0.82%
• 1Y: -16.81%
• 3Y*: -6.67%
• 5Y*: 1.91%
• 10Y*: 19.26%

BIZD

• 1D: 2.25%
• 1M: -4.94%
• YTD: -6.93%
• 6M: -8.73%
• 1Y: -10.64%
• 3Y*: 5.96%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 7.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOA vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd	-0.23%	-31.98%	5.16%	58.49%	-9.78%	54.32%	-17.24%	37.27%	81.63%	30.91%
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	-6.93%	-4.96%	15.63%	27.02%	-8.51%	36.25%	-7.12%	30.87%	-6.88%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between NOA and BIZD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013	0.29

Return for Risk

NOA vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOA

NOA Risk / Return Rank: 26
NOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NOA Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
NOA Martin Ratio Rank: 24

BIZD

BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 4
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOA vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOA	BIZD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	-0.59	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	-0.73	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.92	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	-0.48	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.90	-0.84	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOA vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOA Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOA and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOA	BIZD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	-0.59	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.26	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.37	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.31	-0.30

Drawdowns

NOA vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOA drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOA and BIZD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOA	BIZD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.59%	-55.44%	-38.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.31%	-22.22%	-10.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.67%	-22.56%	-28.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.67%	-22.91%	-27.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.41%	-55.44%	-12.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.55%	-17.45%	-24.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.69%	-6.72%	-48.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.74%	12.68%	+6.06%

Volatility

NOA vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a higher volatility of 13.82% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 5.39%. This indicates that NOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOA	BIZD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.82%	5.39%	+8.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.08%	14.95%	+26.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.94%	18.25%	+32.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.36%	17.43%	+24.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.97%	21.74%	+24.23%

Dividends

NOA vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

NOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than BIZD's 13.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	13.57%	11.78%	10.94%	10.96%	11.21%	8.14%	10.39%	9.13%	10.88%	9.13%	8.51%	9.12%
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd	2.45%	2.39%	1.42%	1.54%	1.84%	0.85%	1.21%	0.74%	0.73%	1.62%	2.08%	4.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOA and BIZD in my portfolio?

NOA and BIZD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOA or BIZD?

NOA has higher volatility (13.82%) compared to BIZD (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOA dropped -93.59% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.