NOA vs. BIZD

In the year-to-date period, NOA achieves a -20.88% return, which is significantly lower than BIZD's -2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, NOA has outperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 21.40%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.82% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NOA Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOA and BIZD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than BIZD's 11.37% yield.

The maximum NOA drawdown since its inception was -93.62%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOA and BIZD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 5.54%. This indicates that NOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.