PortfoliosLab logo
NOA vs. CMI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NOA and CMI is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NOA vs. CMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NOA:

-0.51

CMI:

0.42

Sortino Ratio

NOA:

-0.51

CMI:

1.00

Omega Ratio

NOA:

0.94

CMI:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

NOA:

-0.42

CMI:

0.55

Martin Ratio

NOA:

-1.22

CMI:

1.67

Ulcer Index

NOA:

15.89%

CMI:

10.11%

Daily Std Dev

NOA:

39.03%

CMI:

31.34%

Max Drawdown

NOA:

-93.62%

CMI:

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

NOA:

-35.06%

CMI:

-13.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOA:

$468.63M

CMI:

$42.25B

EPS

NOA:

$1.10

CMI:

$20.30

PE Ratio

NOA:

14.35

CMI:

15.11

PEG Ratio

NOA:

4.82

CMI:

2.30

PS Ratio

NOA:

0.40

CMI:

1.25

PB Ratio

NOA:

1.67

CMI:

3.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOA:

$868.76M

CMI:

$33.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOA:

$156.76M

CMI:

$8.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOA:

$214.51M

CMI:

$4.90B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOA achieves a -24.60% return, which is significantly lower than CMI's -4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NOA has outperformed CMI with an annualized return of 20.97%, while CMI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.87% annualized return.


NOA

YTD

-24.60%

1M

13.20%

6M

-20.25%

1Y

-19.87%

5Y*

28.71%

10Y*

20.97%

CMI

YTD

-4.72%

1M

15.64%

6M

-6.87%

1Y

13.12%

5Y*

20.59%

10Y*

11.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOA vs. CMI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOA is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOA is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOA is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOA is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOA is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOA is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

CMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMI is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMI is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMI is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMI is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMI is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMI is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NOA vs. CMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NOA Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the CMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOA and CMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NOA vs. CMI - Dividend Comparison

NOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than CMI's 2.16% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NOA
North American Construction Group Ltd
1.95%1.42%1.42%1.84%0.85%1.21%0.91%0.69%1.66%2.08%4.34%2.29%
CMI
Cummins Inc.
2.16%2.01%2.71%2.49%2.57%2.33%2.74%3.32%2.38%2.93%3.99%1.95%

Drawdowns

NOA vs. CMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOA drawdown since its inception was -93.62%, which is greater than CMI's maximum drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOA and CMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NOA vs. CMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) is 7.34%, while Cummins Inc. (CMI) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that NOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NOA vs. CMI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between North American Construction Group Ltd and Cummins Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
305.59M
8.17B
(NOA) Total Revenue
(CMI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOA vs. CMI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between North American Construction Group Ltd and Cummins Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
13.7%
26.4%
(NOA) Gross Margin
(CMI) Gross Margin
NOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 41.99M and revenue of 305.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.7%.

CMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cummins Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.16B and revenue of 8.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.

NOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North American Construction Group Ltd reported an operating income of 22.54M and revenue of 305.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

CMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cummins Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 8.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

NOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a net income of 4.81M and revenue of 305.59M, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.

CMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cummins Inc. reported a net income of 824.00M and revenue of 8.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.