NOA vs. CMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Cummins Inc. (CMI).

Performance

NOA vs. CMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NOA vs. CMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd	-6.81%	-31.98%	5.16%	58.49%	-9.78%	54.32%	-17.24%	37.27%	81.63%	30.91%
CMI Cummins Inc.	8.13%	49.36%	48.92%	1.72%	14.09%	-1.68%	30.50%	38.04%	-22.06%	32.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NOA : $375.86M CMI : $76.46B
EPS NOA : $1.09 CMI : $20.50
PE Ratio NOA : 12.21 CMI : 26.83
PS Ratio NOA : 0.32 CMI : 2.27
PB Ratio NOA : 0.82 CMI : 6.19
Total Revenue (TTM) NOA : $1.28B CMI : $33.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) NOA : $161.75M CMI : $8.52B
EBITDA (TTM) NOA : $329.71M CMI : $5.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOA achieves a -6.81% return, which is significantly lower than CMI's 8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NOA has outperformed CMI with an annualized return of 22.87%, while CMI has yielded a comparatively lower 20.59% annualized return.

NOA

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -20.52%
• YTD: -6.81%
• 6M: -7.78%
• 1Y: -14.88%
• 3Y*: -5.57%
• 5Y*: 5.14%
• 10Y*: 22.87%

CMI

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 30.54%
• 1Y: 77.68%
• 3Y*: 35.10%
• 5Y*: 19.18%
• 10Y*: 20.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NOA vs. CMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOA

NOA Risk / Return Rank: 27
NOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NOA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
NOA Martin Ratio Rank: 27

CMI

CMI Risk / Return Rank: 92
CMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CMI Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CMI Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOA vs. CMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOA	CMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	2.29	-2.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	2.89	-2.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.40	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	4.77	-5.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	15.91	-16.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOA vs. CMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOA Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the CMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOA and CMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOA	CMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	2.29	-2.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.71	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.74	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.37	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between NOA and CMI is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NOA vs. CMI - Dividend Comparison

NOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than CMI's 1.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd	2.60%	2.39%	1.42%	1.54%	1.84%	0.85%	1.21%	0.74%	0.73%	1.62%	2.08%	4.62%
CMI Cummins Inc.	1.42%	1.50%	2.01%	2.71%	2.49%	2.57%	2.33%	2.74%	3.32%	2.38%	2.93%	3.99%

Drawdowns

NOA vs. CMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOA drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, which is greater than CMI's maximum drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOA and CMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOA	CMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.59%	-75.66%	-17.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.31%	-16.52%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.67%	-30.48%	-20.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.41%	-44.05%	-24.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.40%	-8.87%	-36.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.82%	-22.31%	-33.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.11%	4.95%	+12.16%

Volatility

NOA vs. CMI - Volatility Comparison

North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a higher volatility of 34.87% compared to Cummins Inc. (CMI) at 10.83%. This indicates that NOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOA	CMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.87%	10.83%	+24.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.94%	25.18%	+16.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.99%	34.07%	+17.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.45%	27.10%	+15.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.20%	27.88%	+18.32%

Financials

NOA vs. CMI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between North American Construction Group Ltd and Cummins Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 38.31M and revenue of 305.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

CMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.95B and revenue of 8.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.9%.

NOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported an operating income of 21.21M and revenue of 305.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

CMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cummins Inc. reported an operating income of 670.00M and revenue of 8.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

NOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a net income of 124.90K and revenue of 305.33M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

CMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a net income of 593.00M and revenue of 8.54B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.