EXBAX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
EXBAX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXBAX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -4.84% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -14.52% | 7.97% | 14.96% | 16.15% | -3.54% | 11.59% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXBAX achieves a -4.84% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, EXBAX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 5.08%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
EXBAX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -4.84%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXBAX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXBAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXBAX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
EXBAX
SICIX
EXBAX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXBAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.66 | -1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 2.20 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 2.19 | -1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | 8.95 | -7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXBAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.66 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.84 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.87 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXBAX and SICIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXBAX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
EXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 6.06% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
EXBAX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXBAX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXBAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.86% | -27.62% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -2.73% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -10.94% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.23% | -11.61% | -7.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -2.39% | -4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -3.59% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 0.67% | +1.00% |
Volatility
EXBAX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that EXBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXBAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 1.24% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.03% | 2.06% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.91% | 3.66% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 3.87% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 3.89% | +3.71% |