EWZ vs. XES
EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) and XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while XES is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWZ returned 6.86%/yr vs -4.13%/yr for XES. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XES.
Performance
EWZ vs. XES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWZ achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 37.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZ has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 6.86%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -4.13% annualized return.
EWZ
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 36.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.86%
XES
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- 6M
- 26.49%
- YTD
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 65.04%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.19%
- 10Y*
- -4.13%
EWZ vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 14.17% | 48.81% | -30.41% | 32.62% | 12.09% | -17.32% | -20.35% | 27.67% | -2.52% | 23.62% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 37.45% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWZ and XES is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EWZ and XES has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EWZ vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWZ
XES
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
EWZ
XES
-
Energy
EWZ
XES
Basic Materials
EWZ
XES
-
Utilities
EWZ
XES
-
Industrials
EWZ
XES
Consumer Defensive
EWZ
XES
-
Healthcare
EWZ
XES
-
Communication Services
EWZ
XES
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWZ
XES
-
Technology
EWZ
XES
-
Real Estate
EWZ
-
XES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWZ vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank
EWZ
XES
EWZ vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWZ | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.18 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 11.53 | -6.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWZ vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWZ drawdown since its inception was -77.25%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZ and XES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWZ | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.25% | -95.65% | +18.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.27% | -20.69% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.36% | -45.95% | +14.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.24% | -45.95% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.99% | -91.23% | +34.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.49% | -73.46% | +52.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -54.44% | +18.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.20% | 5.70% | +1.50% |
Volatility
EWZ vs. XES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) is 5.74%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that EWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWZ | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 9.22% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 21.50% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.98% | 30.96% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 38.85% | -11.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.90% | 44.88% | -10.98% |
EWZ vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWZ vs. XES - Dividend Comparison
EWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than XES's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 4.07% | 5.19% | 8.91% | 5.66% | 12.59% | 9.87% | 1.71% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 1.71% | 1.81% | 4.08% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.16% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWZ and XES have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XES has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to EWZ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZ dropped -77.25% vs XES's -95.65%.
On 10-year performance, EWZ leads with 6.86% vs -4.13% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWZ has performed better with a 6.86% return vs -4.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZ.
EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.16% for XES.
EWZ is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XES is Energy Equities. EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZ and 0.35% for XES.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWZ and XES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer