PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWU vs. ENOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWU vs. ENOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWU achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than ENOR's 28.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EWU has underperformed ENOR with an annualized return of 7.86%, while ENOR has yielded a comparatively higher 9.38% annualized return.


EWU

1D
0.99%
1M
0.93%
YTD
6.59%
6M
10.05%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
7.86%

ENOR

1D
-0.03%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
28.18%
6M
33.39%
1Y
36.69%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWU vs. ENOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
6.59%34.95%6.74%12.40%-4.39%18.19%-11.80%21.29%-14.30%21.54%
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
28.18%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EWU and ENOR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2012

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between EWU and ENOR has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWU vs. ENOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWU
ENOR

Financial Services

26.0%
22.4%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
12.4%

Healthcare

13.9%

-

Industrials

12.1%
13.9%

Energy

11.0%
29.2%

Basic Materials

9.3%
10.8%

Utilities

5.1%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

2.4%
5.8%

Technology

0.6%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.4%

Financial Services

EWU
26.0%
ENOR
22.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWU
14.2%
ENOR
12.4%

Healthcare

EWU
13.9%
ENOR

-

Industrials

EWU
12.1%
ENOR
13.9%

Energy

EWU
11.0%
ENOR
29.2%

Basic Materials

EWU
9.3%
ENOR
10.8%

Utilities

EWU
5.1%
ENOR
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EWU
4.0%
ENOR
0.2%

Communication Services

EWU
2.4%
ENOR
5.8%

Technology

EWU
0.6%
ENOR
4.1%

Real Estate

EWU
0.6%
ENOR
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWU vs. ENOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWU
EWU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWU Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWU vs. ENOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWUENORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

4.09

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

11.56

-3.76

EWU vs. ENOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWU Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the ENOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWU and ENOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWUENORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.12

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.37

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.39

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.25

+0.01

Drawdowns

EWU vs. ENOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWU drawdown since its inception was -63.99%, which is greater than ENOR's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWU and ENOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWUENORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.99%

-55.35%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-9.01%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-15.84%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-32.65%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.33%

-54.21%

+10.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-3.18%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-16.57%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.18%

-0.44%

Volatility

EWU vs. ENOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) at 4.81%. This indicates that EWU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWUENORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

4.81%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

13.62%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

17.40%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

22.16%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

24.01%

-5.17%

EWU vs. ENOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ENOR's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWU vs. ENOR - Dividend Comparison

EWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than ENOR's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.31%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
3.50%3.73%4.16%4.14%3.43%4.35%2.48%4.13%4.98%3.91%3.97%4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWU and ENOR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWU has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to ENOR (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWU dropped -63.99% vs ENOR's -55.35%.

On 10-year performance, ENOR leads with 9.38% vs 7.86% for EWU. On fees, EWU is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ENOR has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ENOR has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWU is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.

EWU has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.

EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index, while ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWU and 0.53% for ENOR.

ENOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWU and ENOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer