PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWU vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWU vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWU achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EWU has underperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 7.75%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


EWU

1D
-1.09%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
5.55%
6M
8.87%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
7.75%

FEZ

1D
-1.26%
1M
5.21%
YTD
5.18%
6M
6.87%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWU vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
5.55%34.95%6.74%12.40%-4.39%18.19%-11.80%21.29%-14.30%21.54%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
5.18%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EWU and FEZ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2002

0.82

The correlation between EWU and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWU vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWU
FEZ

Financial Services

26.0%
23.4%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
5.4%

Healthcare

13.9%
5.2%

Industrials

12.1%
20.1%

Energy

11.0%
5.0%

Basic Materials

9.3%
3.5%

Utilities

5.1%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
8.6%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.5%

Technology

0.6%
17.9%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Financial Services

EWU
26.0%
FEZ
23.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWU
14.2%
FEZ
5.4%

Healthcare

EWU
13.9%
FEZ
5.2%

Industrials

EWU
12.1%
FEZ
20.1%

Energy

EWU
11.0%
FEZ
5.0%

Basic Materials

EWU
9.3%
FEZ
3.5%

Utilities

EWU
5.1%
FEZ
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EWU
4.0%
FEZ
8.6%

Communication Services

EWU
2.4%
FEZ
3.5%

Technology

EWU
0.6%
FEZ
17.9%

Real Estate

EWU
0.6%
FEZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWU vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWU
EWU Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWU Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWU vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWUFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

1.25

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

4.25

+3.29

EWU vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWU Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWU and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWUFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.95

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.48

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.49

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.30

-0.04

Drawdowns

EWU vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWU drawdown since its inception was -63.99%, roughly equal to the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWU and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWUFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.99%

-64.21%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-13.63%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-15.85%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-35.05%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.33%

-39.69%

-3.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.64%

-2.33%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-17.07%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.99%

-1.26%

Volatility

EWU vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) is 5.56%, while SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that EWU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWUFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

6.72%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

14.85%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

17.91%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

20.61%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

21.11%

-2.27%

EWU vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWU vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

EWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than FEZ's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
3.53%3.73%4.16%4.14%3.43%4.35%2.48%4.13%4.98%3.91%3.97%4.11%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.57%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWU and FEZ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEZ has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to EWU (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWU dropped -63.99% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 10.28% vs 7.75% for EWU. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, EWU has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWU.

EWU has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.57% for FEZ.

EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWU and 0.29% for FEZ.

EWU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWU and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer