PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EWT vs. KBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


EWTKBA
YTD Return19.05%19.94%
1Y Return34.84%16.56%
3Y Return (Ann)5.58%-8.72%
5Y Return (Ann)14.22%2.44%
10Y Return (Ann)11.20%3.62%
Sharpe Ratio1.920.67
Sortino Ratio2.531.17
Omega Ratio1.331.17
Calmar Ratio1.840.36
Martin Ratio9.142.48
Ulcer Index4.38%7.28%
Daily Std Dev20.82%27.04%
Max Drawdown-64.26%-53.24%
Current Drawdown-3.66%-33.86%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between EWT and KBA is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EWT vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWT having a 19.05% return and KBA slightly higher at 19.94%. Over the past 10 years, EWT has outperformed KBA with an annualized return of 11.20%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.62% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
217.97%
68.37%
EWT
KBA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EWT vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.


KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
Expense ratio chart for KBA: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for EWT: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EWT vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EWT, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EWT, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EWT, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EWT, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EWT, currently valued at 9.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.009.14
KBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KBA, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.48

EWT vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWT Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the KBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWT and KBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.92
0.67
EWT
KBA

Dividends

EWT vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.09%, more than KBA's 1.95% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
10.09%12.01%18.82%2.64%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%1.93%1.82%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.95%2.34%26.65%9.07%0.65%1.53%3.77%0.99%4.90%29.08%0.11%0.00%

Drawdowns

EWT vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.26%, which is greater than KBA's maximum drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and KBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.66%
-33.86%
EWT
KBA

Volatility

EWT vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) is 5.01%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that EWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.01%
17.01%
EWT
KBA