KBA vs. JEPI
KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) and JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Index, while JEPI is a Dividend fund actively managed by JPMorgan. KBA is passively managed, while JEPI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, KBA returned 6.65%/yr vs 7.30%/yr for JEPI. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.
Performance
KBA vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBA achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 0.01% return.
KBA
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 12.46%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
JEPI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 7.76%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
KBA vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 12.46% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 49.31% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.01% | 8.09% | 12.57% | 9.83% | -3.49% | 21.52% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBA and JEPI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020 | 0.21 |
KBA vs. JEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBA
JEPI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
KBA
JEPI
Financial Services
KBA
JEPI
Industrials
KBA
JEPI
Basic Materials
KBA
JEPI
Consumer Defensive
KBA
JEPI
Consumer Cyclical
KBA
JEPI
Healthcare
KBA
JEPI
Energy
KBA
JEPI
Utilities
KBA
JEPI
Communication Services
KBA
JEPI
Real Estate
KBA
JEPI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBA vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank
KBA
JEPI
KBA vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBA | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 0.99 | +1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.86 | 1.48 | +2.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.18 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.57 | 1.18 | +5.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 3.87 | +13.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBA | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 0.99 | +1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.66 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.01 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
KBA vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and JEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBA | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.24% | -13.71% | -39.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -6.68% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.23% | -13.26% | -17.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.95% | -13.71% | -26.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -4.96% | +3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.82% | -2.11% | -23.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.04% | +0.81% |
Volatility
KBA vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) at 1.34%. This indicates that KBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBA | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 1.34% | +6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 6.10% | +6.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 7.85% | +9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.21% | 11.06% | +16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 10.80% | +14.52% |
KBA vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBA vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison
KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than JEPI's 8.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.28% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 8.40% | 11.68% | 6.59% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.39% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBA and JEPI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBA has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to JEPI (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBA dropped -53.24% vs JEPI's -13.71%.
On 5-year performance, JEPI leads with 7.30% vs 6.65% for KBA. On fees, JEPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JEPI has performed better with a 7.30% return vs 6.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KBA.
JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.28%, compared with 1.39% for KBA.
KBA is categorized as China Equities, while JEPI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: CICC and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KBA and 0.35% for JEPI.
KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBA and JEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer