KBA vs. JEPI
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI).
KBA and JEPI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. JEPI is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase. It was launched on May 20, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KBA or JEPI.
Performance
KBA vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBA achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 14.75% return.
KBA
18.30%
-4.03%
6.94%
15.18%
2.64%
2.91%
JEPI
14.75%
-0.15%
7.61%
18.00%
N/A
N/A
Key characteristics
| KBA | JEPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.57 | 2.58 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.04 | 3.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.32 | 4.71 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.97 | 18.29 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.27% | 0.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.44% | 7.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.24% | -13.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -34.77% | -1.08% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KBA vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between KBA and JEPI is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KBA vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KBA vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison
KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than JEPI's 7.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.98% | 2.34% | 26.65% | 9.06% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.00% | 4.90% | 29.08% | 0.11% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.13% | 8.40% | 11.67% | 6.59% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KBA vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and JEPI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KBA vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) at 2.18%. This indicates that KBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.