PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWT vs. EWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWT vs. EWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a 51.98% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 61.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EWT has outperformed EWY with an annualized return of 17.98%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively lower 13.13% annualized return.


EWT

1D
2.71%
1M
-7.92%
6M
41.86%
YTD
51.98%
1Y
72.95%
3Y*
34.98%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
17.98%
ALL TIME*
7.00%

EWY

1D
-2.55%
1M
-12.79%
6M
28.34%
YTD
61.59%
1Y
127.36%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
13.13%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$630.60M$678.43M$665.11M
$4.45B$4.55B$4.16B

EWT vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
51.98%28.38%16.11%29.00%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
61.59%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EWT and EWY is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2000

0.70

The correlation between EWT and EWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWT vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWT
EWY

Technology

71.6%
54.1%

Financial Services

14.6%
11.4%

Industrials

4.3%
15.7%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.2%

Communication Services

1.8%
2.9%

Healthcare

1.3%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
5.9%

Energy

-

1.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

EWT
71.6%
EWY
54.1%

Financial Services

EWT
14.6%
EWY
11.4%

Industrials

EWT
4.3%
EWY
15.7%

Basic Materials

EWT
3.9%
EWY
2.2%

Communication Services

EWT
1.8%
EWY
2.9%

Healthcare

EWT
1.3%
EWY
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

EWT
1.1%
EWY
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EWT
0.4%
EWY
5.9%

Energy

EWT

-

EWY
1.0%

Real Estate

EWT

-

EWY

-

Utilities

EWT

-

EWY
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWT vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWT vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWTEWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.55

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.15

12.67

+2.48

EWT vs. EWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWT Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the EWY Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWT and EWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWT vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.37%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and EWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWTEWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.37%

-74.14%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.83%

-34.21%

+14.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-34.21%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-47.15%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

-49.73%

+10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.43%

-28.33%

+14.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.09%

-20.10%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

9.56%

-4.72%

Volatility

EWT vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) is 13.40%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 22.08%. This indicates that EWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWTEWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

22.08%

-8.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.56%

50.88%

-23.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.78%

54.29%

-23.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.94%

32.77%

-8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

29.38%

-7.19%

EWT vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWT and EWY have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

EWT vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison

EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than EWY's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.92%4.43%3.32%12.01%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.30%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWT and EWY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (22.08%) compared to EWT (13.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWT dropped -64.37% vs EWY's -74.14%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 17.98% vs 13.13% for EWY. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EWT has been the lower-risk option at 13.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 17.98% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWT and EWY have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 1.30% for EWY.

EWT is categorized as Taiwan Equities, while EWY is South Korea Equities. EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWT and EWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer