EWT vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan Index while FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWT returned 18.33%/yr vs 19.48%/yr for FLKR. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

EWT vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a 68.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.

EWT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 18.24%
• YTD: 68.27%
• 6M: 72.42%
• 1Y: 110.37%
• 3Y*: 38.34%
• 5Y*: 18.33%
• 10Y*: 19.90%

FLKR

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 29.00%
• YTD: 114.41%
• 6M: 130.14%
• 1Y: 238.40%
• 3Y*: 51.14%
• 5Y*: 19.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWT vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	68.27%	28.38%	16.11%	23.97%	-28.90%	26.18%	31.50%	33.36%	-9.90%	-1.96%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	114.41%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EWT and FLKR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.74

The correlation between EWT and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWT vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWT	FLKR
Technology	72.9%	64.3%
Financial Services	13.0%	7.6%
Industrials	4.9%	12.8%
Basic Materials	3.5%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	6.0%
Communication Services	1.9%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	1.5%
Healthcare	0.8%	2.5%
Energy	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

EWT vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWT

EWT Risk / Return Rank: 95
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWT vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWT	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.42	5.83	-1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.00	5.23	-0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.73	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.56	10.42	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	32.40	38.67	-6.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWT vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWT Sharpe Ratio is 4.42, which is comparable to the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 5.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWT and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWT	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.42	5.83	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.69	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.55	-0.29

Drawdowns

EWT vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.37%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWT	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.37%	-50.06%	-14.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.51%	-23.03%	+12.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.66%	-26.39%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.88%	-49.51%	+10.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-1.77%	+1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-22.07%	+2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	6.20%	-2.78%

Volatility

EWT vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) is 10.43%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that EWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWT	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.43%	20.21%	-9.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.52%	36.52%	-16.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.10%	41.18%	-16.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.59%	28.19%	-5.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	27.56%	-5.96%

EWT vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWT vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than FLKR's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	2.63%	4.43%	3.32%	8.12%	18.82%	0.55%	1.83%	2.49%	3.16%	2.81%	2.39%	3.12%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.80%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWT and FLKR in my portfolio?

EWT and FLKR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWT or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to EWT (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWT dropped -64.37% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, EWT or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 18.33% for EWT. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EWT has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWT or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWT or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWT or FLKR?

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between EWT and FLKR?

EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWT and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 4.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.