EWS vs. STXE
EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index, while STXE is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EWS returned 21.86%/yr vs 29.77%/yr for STXE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
EWS vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 47.29% return.
EWS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
STXE
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 15.10%
- YTD
- 47.29%
- 6M
- 52.92%
- 1Y
- 84.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWS vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 8.22% | 31.35% | 22.10% | -1.74% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 47.29% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWS and STXE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023 | 0.61 |
The correlation between EWS and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWS vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWS
STXE
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
EWS
STXE
Industrials
EWS
STXE
Real Estate
EWS
STXE
Utilities
EWS
STXE
Consumer Defensive
EWS
STXE
Communication Services
EWS
STXE
Technology
EWS
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
EWS
STXE
Basic Materials
EWS
-
STXE
Energy
EWS
-
STXE
Healthcare
EWS
-
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWS vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
EWS
STXE
EWS vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWS | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.65 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 5.85 | -3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 23.95 | -17.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWS | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 3.70 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.57 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
EWS vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWS | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.00% | -18.92% | -56.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -14.51% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.34% | -18.92% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -1.00% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -3.72% | -18.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.54% | -0.34% |
Volatility
EWS vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) is 3.68%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that EWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWS | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 10.53% | -6.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 20.81% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 22.95% | -8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 17.68% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 17.68% | +0.35% |
EWS vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWS vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than STXE's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.79% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.83% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWS and STXE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXE has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to EWS (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.00% vs STXE's -18.92%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 29.77% vs 21.86% for EWS. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 29.77% return vs 21.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWS.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.83% for STXE.
EWS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while STXE is Emerging Markets Diversified. EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWS and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer