EWO vs. QQQJ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ).
EWO and QQQJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. QQQJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both EWO and QQQJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EWO vs. QQQJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EWO vs. QQQJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 1.58% | 74.21% | 4.05% | 20.63% | -21.95% | 31.50% | 30.31% |
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | -0.15% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 13.68% | -28.25% | 9.76% | 15.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than QQQJ's -0.15% return.
EWO
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 47.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.74%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
QQQJ
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWO vs. QQQJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQJ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EWO vs. QQQJ — Risk / Return Rank
EWO
QQQJ
EWO vs. QQQJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWO | QQQJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 1.24 | +0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | 1.80 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.25 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.06 | +1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 8.43 | +3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWO | QQQJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.24 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.16 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.31 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between EWO and QQQJ is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EWO vs. QQQJ - Dividend Comparison
EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than QQQJ's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 2.35% | 2.38% | 7.40% | 5.66% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% |
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.88% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EWO vs. QQQJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than QQQJ's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and QQQJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWO | QQQJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -39.57% | -36.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -13.54% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.82% | -39.57% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.16% | -6.66% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.27% | -16.19% | -12.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.30% | +0.85% |
Volatility
EWO vs. QQQJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) have volatilities of 8.13% and 8.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EWO | QQQJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 8.53% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 14.59% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 22.41% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 21.98% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 22.11% | +0.68% |