EWN vs. TLT
EWN (iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWN returned 13.34%/yr vs -2.38%/yr for TLT. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EWN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
EWN vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EWN has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 13.34%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -2.38% annualized return.
EWN
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- YTD
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 37.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.52%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -2.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.58M | $19.47M | $16.07M | |
| $2.33B | $2.02B | $2.19B |
EWN vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF | 18.31% | 34.87% | 1.67% | 22.08% | -24.43% | 22.74% | 23.23% | 32.45% | -15.37% | 33.73% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -3.49% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWN and TLT is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002 | -0.20 |
The correlation between EWN and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWN vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
EWN
TLT
EWN vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWN | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.99 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | -0.14 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | -0.30 | +10.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWN vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWN | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.22% | -48.35% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.24% | -7.74% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.77% | -14.79% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.57% | -43.70% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.57% | -48.35% | +4.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.67% | -42.36% | +36.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -13.99% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.57% | +0.07% |
Volatility
EWN vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.46%. This indicates that EWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWN | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 2.46% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.19% | 6.85% | +12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.36% | 9.32% | +13.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 15.74% | +7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 14.83% | +6.48% |
EWN vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWN vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than TLT's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF | 4.25% | 5.03% | 2.18% | 1.79% | 1.98% | 1.01% | 0.78% | 2.57% | 2.40% | 1.68% | 2.71% | 1.92% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWN and TLT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWN has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to TLT (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWN dropped -65.22% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 13.34% vs -2.38% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 13.34% return vs -2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWN.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.25% for EWN.
EWN is categorized as Europe Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWN and 0.15% for TLT.
EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWN and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer