PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EWN vs. ICLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


EWNICLN
YTD Return4.13%-19.13%
1Y Return19.62%-5.28%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.05%-18.92%
5Y Return (Ann)8.63%4.53%
10Y Return (Ann)8.86%4.02%
Sharpe Ratio1.02-0.23
Sortino Ratio1.48-0.15
Omega Ratio1.190.98
Calmar Ratio0.78-0.09
Martin Ratio4.32-0.56
Ulcer Index4.49%10.40%
Daily Std Dev18.97%25.75%
Max Drawdown-65.22%-87.16%
Current Drawdown-12.71%-66.91%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between EWN and ICLN is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EWN vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's -19.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EWN has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 8.86%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.99%
-9.09%
EWN
ICLN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EWN vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.


EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
Expense ratio chart for EWN: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for ICLN: current value at 0.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.46%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EWN vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EWN, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EWN, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EWN, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EWN, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EWN, currently valued at 4.32, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.32
ICLN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ICLN, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ICLN, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ICLN, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ICLN, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ICLN, currently valued at -0.56, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.56

EWN vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWN and ICLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.02
-0.23
EWN
ICLN

Dividends

EWN vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than ICLN's 1.75% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
1.97%1.79%1.98%1.02%0.78%2.58%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%2.30%1.50%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.75%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%2.83%2.11%

Drawdowns

EWN vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.71%
-66.91%
EWN
ICLN

Volatility

EWN vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) is 6.34%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that EWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.34%
9.14%
EWN
ICLN