EWN vs. EDEN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN).
EWN and EDEN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. EDEN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2012. Both EWN and EDEN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWN or EDEN.
Performance
EWN vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EWN has underperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 8.17%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.
EWN
1.09%
-6.98%
-11.57%
8.61%
8.16%
8.17%
EDEN
0.57%
-8.17%
-11.15%
7.26%
13.09%
10.28%
Key characteristics
| EWN | EDEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.47 | 0.45 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.45 | 0.47 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.63 | 1.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.38% | 4.45% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.82% | 16.10% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.22% | -36.61% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.25% | -15.59% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWN vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between EWN and EDEN is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWN vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWN vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison
EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than EDEN's 1.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF | 2.03% | 1.79% | 1.98% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 2.58% | 2.40% | 1.68% | 2.71% | 1.92% | 2.30% | 1.50% |
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 1.40% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% | 0.87% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
EWN vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and EDEN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWN vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) is 4.40%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that EWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.