PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWN vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWN vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EWN has outperformed NORW with an annualized return of 13.34%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.


EWN

1D
-0.93%
1M
-1.10%
6M
8.36%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
37.76%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
13.34%
ALL TIME*
7.52%

NORW

1D
0.86%
1M
8.72%
6M
15.41%
YTD
25.23%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.58M$19.47M$16.07M
$730.42K$1.20M$2.79M

EWN vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
18.31%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%33.73%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
25.23%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EWN and NORW is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2009

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between EWN and NORW has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWN vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWN
NORW

Technology

37.8%
3.7%

Financial Services

17.3%
23.8%

Industrials

10.4%
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
11.7%

Communication Services

9.8%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

4.7%
9.5%

Healthcare

2.5%

-

Energy

1.8%
28.3%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.4%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Technology

EWN
37.8%
NORW
3.7%

Financial Services

EWN
17.3%
NORW
23.8%

Industrials

EWN
10.4%
NORW
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWN
9.9%
NORW
11.7%

Communication Services

EWN
9.8%
NORW
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EWN
5.4%
NORW
0.6%

Basic Materials

EWN
4.7%
NORW
9.5%

Healthcare

EWN
2.5%
NORW

-

Energy

EWN
1.8%
NORW
28.3%

Real Estate

EWN
0.7%
NORW
0.4%

Utilities

EWN

-

NORW
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWN vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWN vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWNNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.35

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

7.35

+2.74

EWN vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWN and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWN vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWNNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.22%

-35.62%

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.24%

-14.49%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-16.06%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.57%

-32.78%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.57%

-33.86%

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-4.36%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-10.12%

-6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

4.63%

-0.99%

Volatility

EWN vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 5.02%. This indicates that EWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWNNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

5.02%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.19%

14.10%

+5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.36%

17.33%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

22.01%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

20.56%

+0.75%

EWN vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWN and NORW have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

EWN vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than NORW's 7.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.25%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
7.19%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWN and NORW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to NORW (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWN dropped -65.22% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 13.34% vs 9.90% for NORW. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWN and NORW have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 4.25% for EWN.

EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWN and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer